OK, who is most famous for saying, and meaning it, "If you ever try to leave me, I will murder you and everyone around you"?

Was it:

a) OJ Simpson,


b) Abraham Lincoln, or


c) All of the above?

And make no mistake about it, the motives for murders of both were essentially the same. OJ didn't like being left, and neither did Lincoln.

What's that you say? Your fifth grade card-carrying NEA teacher of damnyankee propaganda told you that the war was fought over slavery? Did you believe that? It wasn't. The South fought for States' Rights. For the Constitution and in congruence with the Declaration of Independence. For self determination and freedom of disassociation, under aforementioned, from dictates by the federal government. Bear in mind that the vast majority of the highly motivated Southern troops were never slave owners. Some were even black. The South was, at the end, even raising all-black military units who were promised post-bellum emancipation in return for fighting for the South. Kinda removes the shibboleth of Southern motivation to defend slavery, doesn't it? That is why the war is properly called the Second War for Independence, not by the damnyankee propaganda misnomer of the "Civil War."

Neither was anti-slavery the North's motive for its attack on the South which, by the way, began under Aggressor Abe and only after seven States already had peaceably seceded under Abe's predecessor President Buchanan. In fact, Abe's action of raising military might to invade sovereign States - not slavery - is what caused the last four Southern States to secede. The North's motive, simply put, was fascism. One definition of fascism is "controlling," and that is precisely what the federal government wanted to do, and did do, to the some of the States which compacted to form it in the first place. Don't bring up the Emancipation Proclamation as a motive for the war. The war started in 1861. The Emancipation Proclamation (which neither freed any of the slaves held in the North nor a single slave held in the South) was not proclaimed until 1863. Certainly, you don't think Aggressor Abe killed Americans for two years before he thought up a motive for his actions? The easiest way to demonstrate that Abe's motive was unConstitutionally to prevent the freedom of disassociation (secession), which is the integral flip side of freedom of association, is to read Lincoln's very own ironic words on secession first as he paraphrases the Declaration of Independence:

Any people anywhere, being inclined and having the power, have the right to rise up, and shake off the existing government, and form a new one that suits them better. This is a most valuable, a most sacred right--a right which we hope and believe is to liberate the world. Nor is this right confined to cases in which the whole people of an existing government, may choose to exercise it. Any portion of such people that can, may revolutionize, and make their own, of so much territory as they inhabit. [Emphasis added.]

And second as we read Aggressor Abe's words on slavery and his true motivation to establish federal fascism or, as he euphemistically calls it, "national authority":

Executive Mansion
Washington, August 22, 1862


Hon. Horace Greeley:
Dear Sir.


I have just read yours of the 19th. addressed to myself through the New-York Tribune. If there be in it any statements, or assumptions of fact, which I may know to be erroneous, I do not, now and here, controvert them. If there be in it any inferences which I may believe to be falsely drawn, I do not now and here, argue against them. If there be perceptable [sic] in it an impatient and dictatorial tone, I waive it in deference to an old friend, whose heart I have always supposed to be right.

As to the policy I "seem to be pursuing" as you say, I have not meant to leave any one in doubt.

I would save the union. I would save it in the shortest way under the Constitution. The sooner the national authority can be restored; the nearer the Union will be "the Union as it was." If there be those who would not save the Union, unless they could at the same time save slavery, I do not agree with them. If there be those who would not save the Union unless they could at the same time destroy slavery, I do not agree with them. My paramount object in this struggle is to save the Union, and is not either to save or to destroy slavery. If I could save the Union without freeing any slave I would do it, and if I could save it by freeing all the slaves I would do it; and if I could save it by freeing some and leaving others alone I would also do that. What I do about slavery, and the colored race, I do because I believe it helps to save the Union; and what I forebear, I forebear because I do not believe it would save the Union. I shall do less whenever I shall believe what I am doing hurts the cause, and I shall do more whenever I shall believe doing more will help the cause. I shall try to correct errors when shown to be errors; and I shall adopt new views so fast as they shall appear to be true views.

I have here stated my purpose according to my view of official duty; and I intend no modification of my oft-expressed personal wish that all men everywhere could be free.

Yours, A. Lincoln.




It would be hard to summarize Lincoln's only motive more succinctly than he did himself, unless it would be with my one own more accurate, if less charitable, word of "fascism." Aggressor Abe did not cause the death of hundreds of thousands of Americans to fight slavery, but rather to fight the obviously Constitutional right of States to secede from his glorious leadership.

No one who has studied the issue would dispute that for at least the first eighteen months of the war, the abolition of slavery was not the issue. The US Senate (on July 26, 1861) declared from the beginning that the purpose of the war was to restore the Union and that there was no other objective.

Also in 1861, an amendment to the Constitution explicitly stated that the federal government had no authority - ever - to interfere with slavery in the States where it existed. Lincoln endorsed this permanent pro-slavery amendment:

I understand a proposed amendment to the Constitution...has passed Congress, to the effect that the Federal Government shall never interfere with the domestic institutions of the States, including that of persons held to service....Holding such a provision to now be implied Constitutional law, I have no objection to its being made express and irrevocable.

And read the words of the Commanding General of the Union Army, Ulysses S. Grant:

If I thought this war was to abolish slavery, I would resign my commission and offer my sword to the other side.

People who worship the federal government (the Left in today's world) have to overlook both history and logic to take sides with Aggressor Abe. Recall that the United States was a voluntary confederation of independent and sovereign States. As in a marriage or any other voluntary contract, such a freedom of association could obviously be also the object of freedom of disassociation - in this case secession. Not clearly included in the Constitution for you? Re-read the Ninth and Tenth Amendments. While that two-faced cesspool Aggressor Abe was lying "of the people, by the people, for the people" out of one side of his mouth he was practicing fascism "of the federal government, against the Constitution, over the sovereign States" out of the other.

For the massive murders of hundreds of thousands of Americans and for fathering - through force - federal fascism over States' and the people's rights, we enshrine Abraham Lincoln as the the worst and bloodiest President ever to blot the history of these United States.